projectdidact.net - Leveraging baseline covariates to improve the efficiency of randomized trials (Rosenblum)









Search Preview

Dr. Michael Rosenblum | ProjectDidact

projectdidact.net
Skip to main content ProjectDidact Toggle navigation
.net > projectdidact.net

SEO audit: Content analysis

Language Error! No language localisation is found.
Title Dr. Michael Rosenblum | ProjectDidact
Text / HTML ratio 54 %
Frame Excellent! The website does not use iFrame solutions.
Flash Excellent! The website does not have any flash contents.
Keywords cloud Randomized Trials Precision Rosenblum Baseline Variables Software Regression Prognostic University Clinical Improving trials Designs Estimator Adaptive Michael Speaker Gain Leveraging
Keywords consistency
Keyword Content Title Description Headings
Randomized 16
Trials 14
Precision 11
Rosenblum 9
Baseline 8
Variables 8
Headings
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
1 0 7 2 0 0
Images We found 2 images on this web page.

SEO Keywords (Single)

Keyword Occurrence Density
Randomized 16 0.80 %
Trials 14 0.70 %
Precision 11 0.55 %
Rosenblum 9 0.45 %
Baseline 8 0.40 %
Variables 8 0.40 %
Software 5 0.25 %
Regression 5 0.25 %
Prognostic 5 0.25 %
University 5 0.25 %
Clinical 5 0.25 %
Improving 5 0.25 %
trials 4 0.20 %
Designs 4 0.20 %
Estimator 4 0.20 %
Adaptive 4 0.20 %
Michael 4 0.20 %
Speaker 4 0.20 %
Gain 4 0.20 %
Leveraging 4 0.20 %

SEO Keywords (Two Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density
Randomized Trials 12 0.60 %
in Randomized 11 0.55 %
Baseline Variables 8 0.40 %
Precision in 6 0.30 %
Prognostic Baseline 5 0.25 %
Rosenblum M 5 0.25 %
Leveraging Prognostic 4 0.20 %
Variables to 4 0.20 %
to Gain 4 0.20 %
Gain Precision 4 0.20 %
Adaptive Enrichment 4 0.20 %
Improving Precision 3 0.15 %
Michael Rosenblum 3 0.15 %
Instructor of 3 0.15 %
of halfday 3 0.15 %
Trials” Speaker 3 0.15 %
Statistical Methods 3 0.15 %
halfday course 3 0.15 %
Randomized Trials” 3 0.15 %
Regression Model 3 0.15 %

SEO Keywords (Three Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density Possible Spam
in Randomized Trials 7 0.35 % No
Prognostic Baseline Variables 5 0.25 % No
Precision in Randomized 5 0.25 % No
Leveraging Prognostic Baseline 4 0.20 % No
Baseline Variables to 4 0.20 % No
Variables to Gain 4 0.20 % No
to Gain Precision 4 0.20 % No
Gain Precision in 4 0.20 % No
Randomized Trials with 3 0.15 % No
Instructor of halfday 3 0.15 % No
of halfday course 3 0.15 % No
Randomized Trials” Speaker 3 0.15 % No
in Randomized Trials” 3 0.15 % No
Software Tools” Instructor 2 0.10 % No
for Confirmatory Randomized 2 0.10 % No
Confirmatory Randomized Trials 2 0.10 % No
Randomized Trials Statistical 2 0.10 % No
Trials Statistical Methods 2 0.10 % No
and Preventive Medicine 2 0.10 % No
June 13 2017 2 0.10 % No

SEO Keywords (Four Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density Possible Spam
Prognostic Baseline Variables to 4 0.20 % No
Gain Precision in Randomized 4 0.20 % No
to Gain Precision in 4 0.20 % No
Variables to Gain Precision 4 0.20 % No
Baseline Variables to Gain 4 0.20 % No
Leveraging Prognostic Baseline Variables 4 0.20 % No
in Randomized Trials” Speaker 3 0.15 % No
Precision in Randomized Trials” 3 0.15 % No
Instructor of halfday course 3 0.15 % No
Statistical Methods and Software 2 0.10 % No
Software Tools” Instructor of 2 0.10 % No
and Software Tools” Instructor 2 0.10 % No
Methods and Software Tools” 2 0.10 % No
Tools” Instructor of halfday 2 0.10 % No
Trials Statistical Methods and 2 0.10 % No
2017 Improving Precision by 2 0.10 % No
Interpretability Problems in Randomized 2 0.10 % No
Improving Precision by Adjusting 2 0.10 % No
Problems in Randomized Trials 2 0.10 % No
Logistic Regression Estimator While 2 0.10 % No

Internal links in - projectdidact.net

People
Investigators | ProjectDidact
Advisory Board
Advisory Board | ProjectDidact
Events
Events | ProjectDidact
News
News | ProjectDidact
Blog
Blogs | ProjectDidact
Sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) designs (Kidwell)
Kelley Kidwell | ProjectDidact
Leveraging baseline covariates to improve the efficiency of randomized trials (Rosenblum)
Dr. Michael Rosenblum | ProjectDidact
Causal analysis of pragmatic trials (Hernán)
Causal analysis of pragmatic trials | ProjectDidact
Sensitivity analysis for randomized trials with missing outcome data (Scharfstein)
Daniel Scharfstein | ProjectDidact
Heterogeneity of treatment effects and individualized treatment effects (Kent, Varadhan)
David Kent and Ravi Varadhan | ProjectDidact

Projectdidact.net Spined HTML


Dr. Michael Rosenblum | ProjectDidact Skip to main content ProjectDidact Toggle navigation Home People Investigators Advisory Board Events News Blog Dr. Michael Rosenblum Project Overview: Improving Estimator Precision and Robustness in Randomized Trials In randomized clinical trials with baseline variables that are prognostic for the primary outcome, there is potential to modernize precision and reduce sample size by thus adjusting for these variables. A major rencontre is that there are multiple statistical methods to retread for baseline variables, but little guidance on which is weightier to use in a given context. The nomination of method can have important consequences. For example, one wontedly used method leads to uninterpretable estimates if there is any treatment effect heterogeneity, which would jeopardize the validity of trial conclusions. The goal of this project (currently underway) is to requite practical guidance on how to stave this problem, while retaining the advantages of covariate adjustment. We will discuss relevant statistical methods and software (which wield to continuous, binary, and time-to-event outcomes). Data examples from stroke and Alzheimer's disease trials will be used to illustrate these methods. Software: Software in SAS and R for enhanced efficiency estimators of treatment effects in randomized trials: Enhanced Precision Estimators for Randomized Trials with Repeated Measures Using Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation (R and SAS code) Presentations Leveraging Prognostic Baseline Variables to Gain Precision in Randomized Trials”, Speaker, Association of Clinical and Translational Statisticians (ACTS) Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD, July 29, 2017. Leveraging Prognostic Baseline Variables to Gain Precision in Randomized Trials”, Speaker, Translational Science, Washington, D.C., April 20, 2017. Leveraging Prognostic Baseline Variables to Gain Precision in Randomized Trials”, Speaker, Victorian Centre for Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, January 12, 2017. Improving Precision by Adjusting for Prognostic Baseline Variables in Randomized Trials with Binary Outcomes, without Regression Model Assumptions”, Speaker, Department of Statistics, University of Colombo, Sri Lanka, January 17, 2017. Short courses: (video-recordings misogynist here: rosenblum.jhu.edu) Adaptive Enrichment Trial Designs: Statistical Methods, Trial Optimization Software, and Four Case Studies”, Instructor of half-day course, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, November 20, 2017. Adaptive Enrichment Designs for Confirmatory Randomized Trials: Statistical Methods and Software Tools”, Instructor of half-day course, Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Johns Hopkins University, August 30, 2017. (127 registered participants) Adaptive Enrichment Designs for Confirmatory Randomized Trials: Statistical Methods and Software Tools”, Instructor of half-day course, University of California Berkeley’s Forum for Collaborative Research in Washington, D.C., June 13, 2017. Working papers: IMPROVING POWER IN GROUP SEQUENTIAL, RANDOMIZED TRIALS BY ADJUSTING FOR PROGNOSTIC BASELINE VARIABLES AND SHORT-TERM OUTCOMES, Tianchen Qian, Michael Rosenblum, and Huitong Qiu Matching the Efficiency Gains of the Logistic Regression Estimator While Avoiding its Interpretability Problems, in Randomized Trials, Michael Rosenblum and Jon Arni Steingrimsson Related work: Simple, Efficient Estimators of Treatment Effects in Randomized Trials Using Generalized Linear Models to Leverage Baseline Variables.Rosenblum, M. and van der Laan, M. J. (2010), International Journal of Biostatistics, 6(1). Leveraging Prognostic Baseline Variables to Gain Precision in Randomized Trials.Colantuoni, E. and Rosenblum, M. (2015), Statistics in Medicine. 34(18), 2602-2617. Enhanced Precision in the Analysis of Randomized Trials with Ordinal Outcomes.Diaz, I., Colantuoni, E., Rosenblum, M. (2016), Biometrics. (72) 422-431. Measuring the Contribution of Genomic Predictors to Improving Estimator Precision in Randomized trials.Patil, P., Colantuoni, E., Leek, J. T., Rosenblum, M. (2016), Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications. 48-54. Improving Precision By Adjusting For Baseline Variables In Randomized Trials With Binary Outcomes, Without Regression Model Assumptions.Steingrmisson, J. A., Hanley, D. F., and Rosenblum, M., Contemporary Clinical Trials. 54. 18-24 Matching the Efficiency Gains of the Logistic Regression Estimator While Avoiding its Interpretability Problems, in Randomized Trials.Rosenblum, Michael and Steingrimsson, Jon Arni, (October 2016). Johns Hopkins University, Dept. of Biostatistics Working Papers. Working Paper 281. Lectures Video-Recording of Short-Course on Adaptive Enrichment Clinical Trial Designs (June 13, 2017) Improving Precision by Adjusting For Baseline Variables in Randomized Trials, without Regression Model Assumptions